5 Winning Entries from British Mammal Photographer of the Year 2014

Written by

Last Updated: Jan 18, 2016

The recently concluded British Mammal Photographer of the Year 2014 shows the best images that tell story, showcase rare behavior, and highlight mammals in their fragile environment. It brought out the best of the British amateur wildlife photography.

These are not mere and cute pictures of everyday mammals such as cats and dogs. The entries are images of the evasive mammals captured in their most unedited and most raw moments. The images were taken in the most challenging of locations to make ordinary extraordinary and tell a magnificent story in behalf of the animal kingdom, class Mammalia.

1st Prize. A hare by Stuart Scott. It captured a moment of an elusive hare taken in the Scottish Borders._h353_w628_m6_ofalse_lfalse

2nd Prize. A swimming seal by Grant Auton. It’s a common seal swimming across but it captured the tranquility of a rather action-filled activity._h353_w628_m6_ofalse_lfalse-1

3rd prize. A stoat by Adrian Hinchliffe. This was taken in Braintree Essex, England._h353_w628_m6_ofalse_lfalse-2

Highly commended. A vole by Ben Andrew. This picture shows a vole in its habitat._h353_w628_m6_ofalse_lfalse-3

Highly Commended. Hares in the snow by Maggie Bruce. Running, chasing hares made it to the highly commended category of the award winning body._h353_w628_m6_ofalse_lfalse-4

Related Posts


Hints on how to write a helpful review

A great review should have the following qualities:

  • A helpful review should connect and engage with the readers using personal experience.
  • An excellent review provides the readers with cogent and unbiased information necessary to help them make the best choice.
  • A review must be well-formatted to make reading easier by using multiple paragraphs and avoiding caps.
  • The primary goal of your review must remain to provide accurate and non-salesy information.
  • Above all, let your review be fair and honest.

We have high level of professional editorial section with zero tolerance policy on fake reviews.

To maintain the genuineness of our brand, we ensure all customer reviews submitted to us are verified and confirmed before publishing. Though we might not be a 100% accurate, however, we try our best to ensure being next to best. For a thorough verification of submitted reviews, we spend close to 7 working days before allowing any customer review to be published since we also work on the earliest submissions first.

The Quality Page Score Explained

    Your Rating*

    Were you able to find the information you were looking for on our website? YesNo

    Did you find that information valuable?

    How likely are you to share our page with a friend? Scale 1 to 5